10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests (Lsat Series) (Lsat Series)

10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests (Lsat Series) (Lsat Series) | Law School Admission Council | My copy fell apart

books:

10 More Actual, Of...

	10 More Actual, Official LSAT PrepTests (Lsat Series) (Lsat Series) Law School Admission Council Law School Admission Council, 2007 - 353 pages average customer review:based on 44 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

highly recommended

Great Test Prep

This Book is great with 10 whole tests. It doesn't explain why you got something wrong, but still a great way to simulate an actual LSAT test.

My copy fell apart

I won't write anything about how I studied or otherwise prepared for the LSAT. I will say this, because no other reviews have mentioned it: The binding is not the best quality. My book fell apart after taking the first test. Still, it is a good selection of real LSAT exams, and provides ample opportunity to practice.

Great study material but book falls apart too easily

If this bood did not fall apart at the binder so easily, I would have rated it with 5 stars. The publisher needs to put more glue in the binding or something to keep the pages from falling apart. Other than that, it is a must for studying for the LSAT.

for more information click here

Good Standard Prep

No hype or pizzazz. Just actual tests that can be used for practice. You supply the stopwatch.

Just a few problems I found....

The problems I have found with this book is some of the exams and the questions are the same as in the previous book. Additionally, I have found a couple of flaws in the games section (I feel bad for the actual test takers and worry about my upcoming exam). For example, on page 203 question 8 ask you "If Norton is scheduled for the fifth performance, which one of the following is true? Per the requirements "Lalitha performs third only if Norton performs fifth." The answer to this question is "C - Lalitha is scheduled for the fourth performance." SAY WHAT??? This goes completely against the requirement rule. This isn't the first error I have come across. In addition, I found the wording of the question stems to be different as oppose to the previous book. So the question is which method are they using? Overrall is it a good book? Sure, since it is the actual exams. BUT God help all of us who are taking this exam. I can only hope that the testmakers know what they are doing with the present exams. It is hard to compare since I have not had the opportunity to see any exam after 1999.

for more information click here