Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English | Jacques Lacan

Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English | Jacques Lacan | Oh the Wonders of Lacan

books:

Ecrits: The First ...

	Ecrits: The First Complete Edition in English Jacques Lacan W. W. Norton, 2007 - 896 pages average customer review:based on 4 reviews view larger image
	for more information click here

"Fink's precise new translation makes this pivotal period in Lacan's thought more accessible to English speakers."?Publishers Weekly, starred review

Brilliant and innovative, Jacques Lacan's work lies at the epicenter of modern thought about otherness, subjectivity, sexual difference, the drives, the law, and enjoyment. This new translation of his complete works offers welcome, readable access to Lacan's seminal thinking on diverse subjects touched upon over the course of his inimitable intellectual career.

Excellent translation

This is a treat - the first complete English translation of Lacan's Ecrits with a wonderful translation by Bruce Fink. After reading a couple pieces, I compared with Sheridan's previous partial translation and found a number of differences. Overall, Fink tends to be more readable and, I suspect, accurate.

Since you're probably already aware of Lacan's thought and importance, I won't go into that here and will restrict my comments to this particular edition. Fink provides endnotes on the translation of certain difficult words and explains how he dealt with them, sometimes with specific examples for particularly tricky sections. It's clear that he understands Lacan's text inside and out. Additionally, his endnotes prove very helpful in understanding some of the German and Latin in Lacan's writing. Because I'm not an expert in psychoanalysis, I found Fink's explanations of certain terms and ideas very helpful.

Lacan provides an index of major concerts, but this was a bit different than what I was expecting. Rather than explicitly stating "The Symbolic Order means . . . ", he gives a general area where the read is encouraged to discover its essence. This is, all things considered, probably a better way to handle the situation for, as we know, Lacan's concepts do not fit into neat little summaries or paraphrases.

Overall, Norton did a great job putting this together. Provided you have the time to sit down and really spend some time with these essays, I definitely recommend this. Even if you don't always agree with Lacan's thought, Ecrits provides some excellent mental stimulation

for more information click here

Oh the Wonders of Lacan

While Lacan is in and of himself very difficult, this is a lovely complilation. Everything you need to atleast attempt to understand Lacan. Best of Luck, it's very much worth it!

Mission impossible?

When you take an erudite French psychoanalyst, who is presenting his take on Freud's German by pressing it through the sieve of French semiotics, one can only hope for so much when that text is then further strained by being pressed into English. A number of these "writings" were originally lectures, meant to be experienced in Lacan's own idiosyncratic delivery (you can enjoy him on YouTube, if you're curious). All this is a way of saying reading Lacan in English is far from a simple or direct thing. Bruce Fink has probably achieved as close to a "clear" translation as the original will allow. One needs to acknowledge that there are concepts that are perfectly clear in French that are a muddle in English, so when you have someone as full of himself as Lacan, that gets pretty intense sometimes. Then Lacan will suddenly engage an unexpected metaphor, or display a moment of real wit, and you forgive his pretentiousness. An influential thinker, and for those of us who haven't mastered French, we can be grateful that Monsieur Fink chose to accept this mission.

for more information click here

Editions du Deuil

Psychoanalysis has taught us that no lapsus is involuntary. A slip of the pen offers direct access to the unconscious, and one can learn much from reading typing errors and erasures--as the French have it, literature equals 'lis tes ratures'.

The opening page of Bruce Fink's English translation of Jacques Lacan's Ecrits offers such a Freudian slip that would have delighted the late French psychoanalyst, who passed away in 1981. On the first page after the title page, the copyright to the original version mentions 'Les Editions du Deuil' instead of referring to 'Les Editions du Seuil', the well-known French publishing house. 'Deuil' pour 'Seuil', mourning instead of threshold: the reader encounters death on the doorstep, he stumbles upon grief at the brink, and sorrow invites itself in.

A Freudian slip is like saying one thing, but meaning your mother. What this typing error suggests, having passed the vigilance of several proof readers, is that we are in mourning of a certain event, of a presence that is forever missing. Only traces remain, but the word is no longer here, and we are reduced to deciphering a script through and beyond its erasures.

Which brings us to a central question: can Lacan pass the test of translation, and is it possible to read his Ecrits in English? Some French authors were meant to be translated. I, for one, find it much easier to read Jacques Derrida in English than in French, although I was born and bred in France and was fortunate enough to attend some of Derrida's lectures at the Ecole Normale Superieure in Paris.

But Lacan, who also lectured at the ENS, is another matter. I am not even sure that his teachings were really meant to be published (publication of the Seminaire indeed led to a major controversy). He was a magician of the spoken word, and his seminar was a permanent happening as well as a Parisian social event. But his magic seemed to vanish when his words were couched on paper.

And the English translation makes it even blander. Take for instance Lacan's famous quip that "capitalism is the exploitation of man by man. Socialism is the reverse". Bruce Fink has a circumvoluted sentence about "the exploitation of one man by another, which is the definition of capitalism, as we know. And socialism, then? It is the opposite". The meaning is there, but the spirit is gone.

for more information click here

products you might be interested in